Bank of America settles with SEC: can we ever trust analysts again?


Bank of America settles with SEC: can we ever trust analysts again?

Filed under: Analyst reports, Deals, Management, Law, Marketing and advertising, Scandals, Bank of America (BAC)Bank of America agreed to pay $26 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle charges that it allowed its traders access to analyst upgrades and downgrades before they were public and issued fraudulent reports on companies including Intel. The SEC also charged that from 1999 to 2001, Bank of America equity analysts were encouraged to provide favorable coverage of companies that had an investment banking relationship with the company.This, along with a recent study showing that analysts may be fudging their track records, should be enough to discourage investors from paying any attention to the analysts, as if the fact that they're usually wrong (pdf download link) wasn't a good enough reason ...

You might be interested in these entries too:

Manulife Settles With SEC for $19 Million

Manulife Financial Corp. and its subsidiaries, including John Hancock, settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission today for nearly $19 million for allegedly using mutual fund assets to pay brokers...

Bank of America - A good stock to own if you have to go big cap

Filed under: Forecasts, Industry, Internet, Competitive strategy, Columns, Citigroup Inc. (C), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Charles Schwab Corp (SCHW), Wells Fargo (WFC) ...

Responses to 'Bank of America settles with SEC: can we ever trust analysts again?'


  1. No Comments

Leave a Reply





eXTReMe Tracker