Filed under: Analyst reports, Deals, Management, Law, Marketing and advertising, Scandals, Bank of America (BAC)Bank of America agreed to pay $26 million to the Securities and Exchange Commission to settle charges that it allowed its traders access to analyst upgrades and downgrades before they were public and issued fraudulent reports on companies including Intel. The SEC also charged that from 1999 to 2001, Bank of America equity analysts were encouraged to provide favorable coverage of companies that had an investment banking relationship with the company.This, along with a recent study showing that analysts may be fudging their track records, should be enough to discourage investors from paying any attention to the analysts, as if the fact that they're usually wrong (pdf download link) wasn't a good enough reason ...
Categories
- About Flood Insurance
- Allstate Insurance Claim
- Articles
- Blogroll
- Commercial Vehicle Insurance
- Credit Insurance Company
- Directories
- Disability Benefits Insurance
- Friends
- Gadgets
- Home Insurance
- House Insurance
- In Car Insurance
- In Dental Insurance
- Insurance Claims
- Insurance Companies
- Insurance News
- International Health Insurance
- Liability Insurance
- Life Insurance
- Medical Insurance
- Pet Insurance
- Progressive Insurance
- Reinsurance
- State Farm Insurance
- Sun
- Taxes
- Travel Insurance
- Usefull Resources
- Whole Life Insurance
Search
Latest
- Ex-Cologne Re exec was told deal involved no risk
- House again fails to override Bush’s SCHIP veto
- Blue Cross proposes fix for uninsured Americans
- Dodd urges Senate flood insurance action
- Congress approves bill to expand FMLA for military families
- EU adopts major energy, climate change plan
- Ambac posts $3.3 billion loss
- Reinsurer moves carbon trading desk to London
- Berkshire buys stake in Swiss Re
- Risk issues top WEF agenda

Responses to 'Bank of America settles with SEC: can we ever trust analysts again?'