The Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether shareholders of companies that commit securities fraud can sue third parties, called secondary actors, which may have participated in the fraud, a case which has at minimum significant implications for parts of the professional liability insurance business (see here and here). In simple terms, the key issue is whether third parties that aided and abetted a fraud, even unwittingly, should be liable to shareholders. The secondary actors typically include investment banks and...
Categories
- About Flood Insurance
- Allstate Insurance Claim
- Articles
- Blogroll
- Commercial Vehicle Insurance
- Credit Insurance Company
- Directories
- Disability Benefits Insurance
- Friends
- Gadgets
- Home Insurance
- House Insurance
- In Car Insurance
- In Dental Insurance
- Insurance Claims
- Insurance Companies
- Insurance News
- International Health Insurance
- Liability Insurance
- Life Insurance
- Medical Insurance
- Pet Insurance
- Progressive Insurance
- Reinsurance
- State Farm Insurance
- Sun
- Taxes
- Travel Insurance
- Usefull Resources
- Whole Life Insurance
Search
Latest
- Ex-Cologne Re exec was told deal involved no risk
- House again fails to override Bush’s SCHIP veto
- Blue Cross proposes fix for uninsured Americans
- Dodd urges Senate flood insurance action
- Congress approves bill to expand FMLA for military families
- EU adopts major energy, climate change plan
- Ambac posts $3.3 billion loss
- Reinsurer moves carbon trading desk to London
- Berkshire buys stake in Swiss Re
- Risk issues top WEF agenda

Responses to 'Broader Liability in Securities Fraud Cases'